The Fermi Paradox tells us that intelligent species always tend to destroy themselves. Such truth can never be more emphasized the way we have ruined our environment, the price to pay for our progress. It is ironic that we strive to find new ways to avoid our demise by trying very hard to save the planet while we pillage its resources in order to maintain our very demanding lifestyles.
We have long realized that abusing our resources might lead to the ultimate nightmare of the modern man, the recipe for dystopia, the fall of the power grid. Thus we demonized non renewable energy and joined the bandwagon in supporting Dave Renne renewables such as solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, and hydroelectric. But all these resources have more or less equal footing when it comes to environmental damage, believe it or not.
Renewable power is defined as electricity that comes from replenishable resources based on the human timescale, and is beginning to replace the conventional form in the area of rural services, heating, generation of electricity, and fuels for transportation. But to be truthful, they are as harmful as fossil fuels.
Fossil fuels have long been notorious for their environmental hazards. Known in the form of petroleum, natural gas and coal, they are to be blamed for oil spills and the excessive emissions of carbon dioxide, which disturbs the greenhouse effect and the carbon budget. They are cheaper, but because we thought sustainable energy is green, we opened our wallets and the following is what we get for our money.
While the sun can sustain us for perhaps another 4 billion years when it comes to producing power, it cannot justify the harmful effects of its production. Solar fuel is dependent on water deposits, and we know that water is now an endangered commodity. Its solar panels require the help of coal in order to be created, and the process of making them results in hazardous sludge and the emission of much more dangerous greenhouse gases such as sulfur hexaflouride, nitrogen triflouride, and hexaflourethane.
Geothermal power depends on groundwater and is replenished by rainshowers and storms, so they are considered as sustainable. Yet the construction of geothermal plants have long contributed to deforestation and destruction of natural habitat. Apparently, you cannot call that environment friendly.
Wind power seems to be the second most well known sustainable. But the reason why the poster children for wind energy, the Danes, still have flat carbon dioxide emissions is because of their near zero population growth, not the use of windpower. Also, the materials needed to build turbines are neodymium and dysprosium, which are rare earth metals. Because they are found in low concentrations and are difficult to extract, they are extracted via sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, and hydrochloric acid, and are heated and vacuumed using a lot of coal, resulting in toxic water.
Biomass was thought to be a win win method. But the expansion of energy crops resulted in having less land for wildlife habitat. Like geothermal plants, biomass also leads to deforestation and air pollution. Hydropower uses tidal fuel from oceans, thus they also ruin marine life and habitats.
To conclude, renewables as green power is a myth. They do not help the environment at all, they are just simply more ways to feed the power grid. The one thing you can do as a consumer is to simply to save energy and stop overpopulating the world.
We have long realized that abusing our resources might lead to the ultimate nightmare of the modern man, the recipe for dystopia, the fall of the power grid. Thus we demonized non renewable energy and joined the bandwagon in supporting Dave Renne renewables such as solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, and hydroelectric. But all these resources have more or less equal footing when it comes to environmental damage, believe it or not.
Renewable power is defined as electricity that comes from replenishable resources based on the human timescale, and is beginning to replace the conventional form in the area of rural services, heating, generation of electricity, and fuels for transportation. But to be truthful, they are as harmful as fossil fuels.
Fossil fuels have long been notorious for their environmental hazards. Known in the form of petroleum, natural gas and coal, they are to be blamed for oil spills and the excessive emissions of carbon dioxide, which disturbs the greenhouse effect and the carbon budget. They are cheaper, but because we thought sustainable energy is green, we opened our wallets and the following is what we get for our money.
While the sun can sustain us for perhaps another 4 billion years when it comes to producing power, it cannot justify the harmful effects of its production. Solar fuel is dependent on water deposits, and we know that water is now an endangered commodity. Its solar panels require the help of coal in order to be created, and the process of making them results in hazardous sludge and the emission of much more dangerous greenhouse gases such as sulfur hexaflouride, nitrogen triflouride, and hexaflourethane.
Geothermal power depends on groundwater and is replenished by rainshowers and storms, so they are considered as sustainable. Yet the construction of geothermal plants have long contributed to deforestation and destruction of natural habitat. Apparently, you cannot call that environment friendly.
Wind power seems to be the second most well known sustainable. But the reason why the poster children for wind energy, the Danes, still have flat carbon dioxide emissions is because of their near zero population growth, not the use of windpower. Also, the materials needed to build turbines are neodymium and dysprosium, which are rare earth metals. Because they are found in low concentrations and are difficult to extract, they are extracted via sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, and hydrochloric acid, and are heated and vacuumed using a lot of coal, resulting in toxic water.
Biomass was thought to be a win win method. But the expansion of energy crops resulted in having less land for wildlife habitat. Like geothermal plants, biomass also leads to deforestation and air pollution. Hydropower uses tidal fuel from oceans, thus they also ruin marine life and habitats.
To conclude, renewables as green power is a myth. They do not help the environment at all, they are just simply more ways to feed the power grid. The one thing you can do as a consumer is to simply to save energy and stop overpopulating the world.
About the Author:
You can visit www.daverennerenewables.net for more helpful information about How Dave Renne Renewables Differ From Fossil Fuels.
No comments:
Post a Comment