Sunday 30 September 2018

An Overview On Job Order Contracting

By Ann Kelly


Many project proponents have suffered from financial disadvantages, time wastage and developments failure due to the choice of delivery tool they selected. There being a number of tools to be used, using Job Order Contracting has proven to be efficient allowing the owner to complete projects in good time, use of finances appropriately and creation of good work relationships.

Initially, the most common tool used traditional methods which usually involved the selection and awarding of design experts to come up with comprehensive designs then thereafter looking for construction services to deliver the final design that was developed. This process also known as design-bid-build method is efficient but brings out distance relationship between the people participating in the project.

Today proponents have indeed taken a preference to job order contracts making it a popular tool in the construction industry. This tool is more service-oriented which creates a proper working relationship among the project owner and the participants in the design and construction phase. Facility owners who have small to medium sized developments both public and private are the most common users of this tool.

Since this tool allows the work to be done within a certain period of time, the cost expected to be incurred is a bit lower than other tools. The pricing of the contract is usually accurate and predictable estimation of costs which helps the client to have a precise budget that will run through the whole development up to its inception. Saving time and costs allows the project to run smoothly creating a better working relationship.

This precise tool is usually advantageous to plan owners who have the desire to complete numerous projects dealing with rehabilitations, renovations and repairs within a short period of time. The project owner usually gives a brief description of intended task, its objectives and targets. The proponent goes further to give desired expectations such as time and dates from the completion of the task having asked for a request for proposal from potential companies.

Since this tool creates a good work relationship among the participants, the owner, designer and the contractor will work side by side in identifying characteristics and issues that will need to be checked on in order to provide the best economically means to perform the work. Site visits done by participants can help complete this task. This will then lead to the submission of the request for proposals for the owner to go through.

In order for the proponent to experience the best work relation with the selected contractor, he or she has to carry out a background check. Since most individuals who have numerous developments being done concurrently and would prefer time to be used sparingly, checking on the previous work of the contractors will help the owner note whether they are true to their service delivery.

Contracting also requires the owner to be careful not to approve request for proposals from ghost companies. Checking on the availability of the company, credibility, physical address, asking from contacts that are actually reachable can be enough proof.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment